![]() Add to these internet shutdowns, limitations on freedom of speech and movement, as well as access to information, education, and healthcare.Īs with Punjab in the 1970s and 1980s, the government painted any and all dissenters as anti-national-and then persecuted them accordingly. Most recently, India revoked Kashmir’s constitutional autonomy in 2019-a takeover of disputed territory in contravention to United Nations’ agreement-and oversaw extreme human rights abuses in Muslim-majority areas of Kashmir, including illegal detention, abuse, and torture. Since becoming India’s Prime Minister in 2014, Modi’s government has faced a barrage of criticism from human rights groups, foreign nations, Indian civil society, and opposition political parties for its treatment of minority communities. ban was in effect for over a decade and only rescinded when it was painfully clear that Modi would be India’s next prime minister. For his role in the genocidal violence foreign nations banned “The Butcher of Gujarat” from entering their countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom. Modi presided over the anti-Muslim pogroms in Gujarat as the state’s Chief Minister. Narendra Modi-is also the figurehead of right-wing Hindu nationalism. Those who have been paying attention to Indian politics in recent decades will not be surprised at all. The government of India has never acknowledged or apologized for this spree of violence, and it remains a visceral memory for many Indians, especially Punjabi Sikhs today. Following a disinformation campaign, the government launched a series of attacks that resulted in mass atrocities and egregious human rights abuses: the military assault on Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple) of Amritsar in June of 1984, the state-sponsored pogroms in November of 1984 following the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by two of her Sikh bodyguards, and, in the decade that followed, a campaign of extra-judicial killings that resulted in tens of thousands of civilian deaths. ![]() Their sustained protests along with a self-determination movement drew the ire of the Indian government, which painted the efforts as anti-national. In the 1970s and 1980s, Punjabi Sikhs led similar agitations that called for better government support of agriculture. These calls refer to a period of Indian history reminiscent of what’s happening today. ![]() ![]() Twitter also suspended 500 accounts that called for a repeat of the 1984 pogroms, a dark moment in India’s history. Twitter removed a tweet from Indian actress Kangana Ranaut that advocated ethnic cleansing of the protestors. Hindu nationalists have used the occasion to call for genocidal violence against protestors. 2, after months of protests, the world’s eyes started to focus on the Indian government’s undemocratic measures, including press censorship, journalist detention, internet shutdowns, and violent crackdowns against the non-violent protestors. While the need for reforms is urgent, farmers are concerned that the new legislation privileges corporations and harms the everyday farmer. Since September, tens of thousands of Indian have gathered in New Delhi to protest three new agricultural laws that aim to deregulate India’s agricultural industry and open it up to free-market forces. The full force and authoritarian tactics of the Indian government have been showcased as they respond to the largest protest in their history.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |